Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 2023 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to quantify infection rate trends for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in 89 Alabama hospitals from 2015 to 2021 to analyze how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted health care delivery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of CLABSI and CAUTI rates, from 89 Alabama hospitals via data from the Alabama Department of Public Health from 2015 to 2021. RESULTS: Based on our modeling strategies, there was a statistically significant decrease in rates of CAUTIs from 2015 to 2019 at an estimated rate of 7% per year (P = 0.0167) and CLABSIs from 2015 to 2018 at an estimated rate of 13% per year (P < .001) in these hospitals. In 2020, the CAUTI and CLABSI rates began increasing at a modeled rate of 29% per year (P = .001) and 35% per year (P < .001) respectively. DISCUSSION: A review of potential causes for the elevated rate of health care-associated infections illustrated that certain practices may have contributed to increased CAUTI and CLABSI rates. Utilizing staff from noncritical care areas with less experience in health care-associated infection prevention, batching of tasks to conserve personal protective equipment, and a nationwide mental health crisis could have affected infection prevention bundle compliance. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in CAUTIs and CLABSIs was observed during the pandemic, likely due to the large volume of patients requiring advanced medical care and subsequent depleted resources.

2.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 37(1): 65-86, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283840

ABSTRACT

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a global public health threat, which disproportionately impact older adults. Host factors including aging-related changes, comorbidities, and geriatric syndromes, such as dementia and frailty, predispose older individuals to infection. The HAI risks from medical interventions such as device use, antibiotic use, and lapses in infection control follow older adults as they transfer among a network of interrelated acute and long-term care facilities. Long-term care facilities are caring for patients with increasingly complex needs, and the home-like communal environment of long-term care facilities creates distinct infection prevention challenges.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Aged , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control , Health Facilities , Delivery of Health Care , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
3.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 17, 2023 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 48% of ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) during hospitalization in an ICU. Dysbiotic oral microbiota can colonize the lower respiratory tract and lead to VAP. It is recommended to introduce oral care strategies in the ICU to prevent VAP. In this study, we observed the impact of an oral hygienic protocol with tooth brushing on cultivable oral bacteriota, the incidence of HAI and patient safety among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in an ICU setting. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 56 adult COVID-19 patients who qualified for mechanical ventilation. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the oral care procedure: standard and extended oral procedures with tooth brushing. Oral bacteriota samples were taken first within 36 h and after 7 days of intubation. Microorganisms were identified by MALDI/TOF mass spectrometry. bacterial health care-associated infection (HAI) cases were retrospectively analyzed by etiology. A PFGE study was performed for Klebsiella pneumoniae to check for clonal spreading of strains from oral bacteriota samples and HAI cases. RESULTS: We observed significant dysbiosis and a decrease in cultivable oral bacteriota diversity, with a high frequency of potentially pathogenic species, including Acinetobacter baumannii and K. pneumoniae. The HAI incidence rate was high (55.2/1000 patient-days), most commonly of K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii etiologies, which correlated with the presence of A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae in the oral samples. Strains isolated from VAP cases were the same as oral isolates in 8 cases. The procedure with tooth brushing led to less frequent identification of A. baumannii in oral samples (55.6% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.001); however, it did not decrease the incidence of HAIs. CONCLUSIONS: Dysbiotic oral bacteriota is an important source of respiratory pathogens. The introduction of tooth brushing in oral hygiene protocols in an ICU setting was effective in decreasing the extent of oral bacteriota dysbiosis; however, it did not reduce the risk of HAIs or mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 1072.6120.333.2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Adult , Humans , Toothbrushing/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Dysbiosis , Retrospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Delivery of Health Care
4.
Viruses ; 14(8)2022 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024264

ABSTRACT

Vaccination coverage against COVID-19 among health care workers (HCWs) of the University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI) of Trieste (North-eastern Italy) by 1 January 2022 was 90.4% with at least one vaccine dose, 84.9% with at least 2 doses, and 75.1% with 3 doses, 98.2% with Comirnaty (Pfizer BioNtech, New York, NY, USA) versus 1.8% with Spikevax (Moderna, Cambridge, MA, USA). From 1 October 2020 to 7 February 2022, 1652 SARS-CoV-2 infections were notified in HCWs of ASUGI Trieste. Although the overall risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion increased over time, the rate of occupational infections progressively declined, from 42.5% during the second COVID-19 wave to 15.6% in the fifth. Between 1 January-7 February 2022 (a period dominated by the Omicron variant), albeit no COVID-19-associated hospitalizations were recorded in HCWs of ASUGI Trieste, 669 SARS-CoV-2 infections were counted against 367 cases observed from 1 October to 31 December 2020, the 3 months preceding the implementation of the vaccination campaign against COVID-19. Job tasks and health care settings turned out to be the most significant risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the effect of workplace prevailed over job task on the biological risk, with greater rates of SARS-CoV-2 infections observed among HCWs operating in areas with higher levels of circulation of the virus, particularly COVID-19 dedicated units.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(9)2022 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1953337

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Good Infection prevention and control (IPC) is vital for tackling antimicrobial resistance and limiting health care-associated infections. We compared IPC performance before (2019) and during the COVID-19 (2021) era at the national IPC unit and all regional (4) and district hospitals (8) in Sierra Leone. METHODS: Cross-sectional assessments using standardized World Health Organizations IPC checklists. IPC performance scores were graded as inadequate = 0-25%, basic = 25.1-50%, intermediate = 50.1-75%, and advanced = 75.1-100%. RESULTS: Overall performance improved from 'basic' to 'intermediate' at the national IPC unit (41% in 2019 to 58% in 2021) and at regional hospitals (37% in 2019 to 54% in 2021) but remained 'basic' at district hospitals (37% in 2019 to 50% in 2021). Priority gaps at the national IPC unit included lack of: a dedicated IPC budget, monitoring the effectiveness of IPC trainings and health care-associated infection surveillance. Gaps at hospitals included no assessment of hospital staffing needs, inadequate infrastructure for IPC and lack of a well-defined monitoring plan with clear goals, targets and activities. CONCLUSION: Although there is encouraging progress in IPC performance, it is slower than desired in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is urgent need to mobilize political will, leadership and resources and make a quantum leap forward.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Infection Control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Sierra Leone/epidemiology
6.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ; 19(9):5642, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1837138

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Good Infection prevention and control (IPC) is vital for tackling antimicrobial resistance and limiting health care-associated infections. We compared IPC performance before (2019) and during the COVID-19 (2021) era at the national IPC unit and all regional (4) and district hospitals (8) in Sierra Leone. Methods: Cross-sectional assessments using standardized World Health Organizations IPC checklists. IPC performance scores were graded as inadequate = 0–25%, basic = 25.1–50%, intermediate = 50.1–75%, and advanced = 75.1–100%. Results: Overall performance improved from ‘basic’ to ‘intermediate’ at the national IPC unit (41% in 2019 to 58% in 2021) and at regional hospitals (37% in 2019 to 54% in 2021) but remained ‘basic’ at district hospitals (37% in 2019 to 50% in 2021). Priority gaps at the national IPC unit included lack of: a dedicated IPC budget, monitoring the effectiveness of IPC trainings and health care-associated infection surveillance. Gaps at hospitals included no assessment of hospital staffing needs, inadequate infrastructure for IPC and lack of a well-defined monitoring plan with clear goals, targets and activities. Conclusion: Although there is encouraging progress in IPC performance, it is slower than desired in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is urgent need to mobilize political will, leadership and resources and make a quantum leap forward.

7.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(5): 563-571, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1557001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures. AIM: To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. FINDINGS: Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers' HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxiliary workers and the HH opportunity for "before contact with patients" should be strengthened. In the future, it will be necessary to develop standardized HH monitoring tools for practical work.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Hand Hygiene , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence , Hand Hygiene/methods , Health Personnel , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control
8.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 25(6): 101637, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1544829

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a public health emergency, as it is a highly contagious disease, health services had to adapt to the high demand for hospitalizations in order to contain hospital outbreaks. We aimed to identify the impact of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 among inpatients at a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Among 455 inpatients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 in March-May, 2020, nosocomial infection was implicated in 42 (9.2%), of whom 23 (54.7%) died. becoming routine, especially when community transmission occur with high levels of incidence. It was possible to observe with this study that the nosocomial transmission by SARS-CoV-2 was present even with these measures instituted, and some of the damages caused by these infections are intangible.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Hospitals, University , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(3): 789-802, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1340083

ABSTRACT

A great clinical microbiology laboratory supporting a great infection prevention program requires focusing on the following services: rapid and accurate identification of pathogens associated with health care-associated infections; asymptomatic surveillance for health care-acquired pathogens before infections arise; routine use of broad and flexible antimicrobial susceptibility testing to direct optimal therapy; implementation of epidemiologic tracking tools to identify outbreaks; development of clear result communication with interpretative comments for clinicians. These goals are best realized in a collaborative relationship with the infection prevention program so that both can benefit from the shared priorities of providing the best patient care.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Laboratories, Hospital , Bacterial Infections/transmission , Humans , Laboratories/organization & administration
10.
Euro Surveill ; 26(30)2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1334901

ABSTRACT

An outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) spread from one inpatient in a secondary care hospital to three primary care facilities, resulting in 58 infections including 18 deaths in patients and 45 infections in healthcare workers (HCW). Only one of the deceased cases was fully vaccinated. Transmission occurred despite the use of personal protective equipment by the HCW, as advised in national guidelines, and a high two-dose COVID-19 vaccination coverage among permanent staff members in the COVID-19 cohort ward.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Disease Outbreaks , Finland/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Secondary Care
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(6): 843-845, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269214

ABSTRACT

Several catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention interventions were successfully implemented and evaluated on a surgical unit in a community-based hospital. Sustainability of CAUTI prevention efforts requires daily communication between multidisciplinary staff. In our hospital, daily report on CAUTI events and indwelling catheters at a hospital-wide, multidisciplinary safety huddle contributed to an enhanced focus on CAUTI-prevention strategies and unit-level reduction in device use days and CAUTI rates.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Urinary Tract Infections , Adult , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , Humans , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
12.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(6): 800-803, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mobile phones may be contaminated with nosocomial pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The aim of this study was to investigate the MRSA contamination rate on doctors' hospital-use-only mobile phones and the efficacy of 222-nm ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection. METHODS: We investigated the MRSA contamination rate of doctors' hospital-use-only mobile phones, as well as the reduction in MRSA counts on plastic plates and aerobic bacteria (AB) on mobile phones before and after exposure to 222-nm UV irradiation. RESULTS: Five (10%) of the 50 mobile phones investigated were contaminated with MRSA. Exposure to 0.1 mJ/cm2 222-nm UVC irradiation for 1.5 and 2.5 min (9 and 15 mJ/cm2) achieved mean log10 MRSA colony-forming units reductions of 2.91 and 3.95, respectively. Exposure to 9 mJ/cm2 222-nm UVC irradiation (0.1 mW/cm2 for 1.5 minutes) significantly reduced AB contamination on mobile phones (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 222-nm UV disinfection resulted in effective in vitro reduction of MRSA and significantly reduced AB contamination of mobile phone surfaces.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Disinfection , Hospitals , Humans , Ultraviolet Rays
13.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(6): ofab201, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1261052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of health care-associated infections (HAIs), especially with prolonged hospital stays. We sought to identify incidence, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes associated with bacterial/fungal secondary infections in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We evaluated adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 2 March and 31 May 2020 and hospitalized >24 hours. Data extracted from medical records included diagnoses, vital signs, laboratory results, microbiological data, and antibiotic use. Microbiologically confirmed bacterial and fungal pathogens from clinical cultures were evaluated to characterize community- and health care-associated infections, including describing temporal changes in predominant organisms on presentation and throughout hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate risk factors for HAIs. RESULTS: A total of 3028 patients were included and accounted for 899 positive clinical cultures. Overall, 516 (17%) patients with positive cultures met criteria for infection. Community-associated coinfections were identified in 183 (6%) patients, whereas HAIs occurred in 350 (12%) patients. Fifty-seven percent of HAIs were caused by gram-negative bacteria and 19% by fungi. Antibiotic resistance increased with longer hospital stays, with incremental increases in the proportion of vancomycin resistance among enterococci and ceftriaxone and carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales. Intensive care unit stay, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids were associated with HAIs. CONCLUSIONS: HAIs occur in a small proportion of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and are most often caused by gram-negative and fungal pathogens. Antibiotic resistance is more prevalent with prolonged hospital stays. Antimicrobial stewardship is imperative in this population to minimize unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use.

14.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(12): 1772-1776, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1260699

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A wide range of bacterial infections occur in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, particularly in those with severe coronaviral disease. Some of these are community-acquired co-infections. OBJECTIVE: To review recent data that indicate the occurrence of hospital-onset bacterial infections, including with antibiotic-resistant isolates, in COVID-19 patients. SOURCES: Using PubMed, the literature was searched using terms including: 'COVID-19'; 'SARS-CoV-2'; 'bacterial infection'; 'healthcare-associated infection'; 'antibiotic resistance'; 'antimicrobial resistance'; 'multi-drug resistance'; 'Streptococcus'; 'Staphylococcus'; 'Pseudomonas'; 'Escherichia'; 'Klebsiella'; 'Enterococcus'; 'Acinetobacter'; 'Haemophilus'; 'MRSA'; 'VRE'; 'ESBL'; 'NDM-CRE'; 'CR-Ab'; 'VRSA'; 'MDR'. CONTENT: There is a growing number of reports of bacterial infections acquired by patients with severe COVID-19 after hospital admission. Antibiotic-resistant pathogens found to cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in COVID-19 patients include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase Klebsiella pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. COVID-19 has impacted bacterial HAIs in a number of ways with an increase in the incidence of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii reported at some hospital sites compared with before the pandemic. Recommended guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship in COVID-19 patient treatment are discussed regarding minimization of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Other studies have reported a decrease in methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci cases, which has been attributed to enhanced infection prevention and control practices introduced to minimize intra-hospital spread of COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS: Poorer outcomes have been observed in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with an antibiotic-resistant infection. Although heightened IPC measures have been accompanied by a reduction in some HAIs at specific sites, in other situations, COVID-19 has been associated with an increase in bacterial HAI incidence. Further research is needed to define the cost-benefit relationship of maintaining COVID-19-related infection prevention and control protocols beyond the pandemic to reduce the burden of HAIs. In addition, the longer-term impact of high usage of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic requires evaluation.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Community-Acquired Infections , Cross Infection , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Carbapenems , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Pandemics
15.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 21(9): 606-612, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents an important infectious complication associated with high mortality rates in patients with hematologic diseases. There have not been published any epidemiologic studies from Czech Republic so far. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is the first analysis of patients with hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes treated at single hematology center in the Czech Republic between March 1 and December 31, 2020, in whom COVID-19 infection was confirmed. RESULTS: The sample comprised 96 patients aged 26 to 84 years (median, 66.0 years). At the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis, 75 patients (78.1%) were treated for hematologic diseases. Twenty-seven patients (28.1%) in the sample had complete remission (CR) of their hematologic disease. They were nonsignificantly more likely to have asymptomatic to moderate COVID-19 infection than those who failed to achieve CR (74.1% vs. 56.5%; P = .06). A more severe course of the infection was significantly correlated with older age (P = .047). Lung involvement was also statistically significantly associated with older age (P = .045). Over the study period, a total of 15 patients died. Age greater than 60 years was significantly associated with deaths from COVID-19 (P = .036), with failure to achieve CR having a statistically nonsignificant impact on mortality (P = .22). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the prognostic significance of age for achieving treatment response of hematologic disease as well as the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in hematology patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Diseases , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Marrow Failure Disorders/complications , Bone Marrow Failure Disorders/diagnosis , Bone Marrow Failure Disorders/epidemiology , Bone Marrow Failure Disorders/therapy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Female , Hematologic Diseases/complications , Hematologic Diseases/diagnosis , Hematologic Diseases/epidemiology , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
16.
J Hosp Infect ; 111: 1-3, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1117975

ABSTRACT

To highlight the urgent need to save lives by implementing best practices in health care delivery, the slogan for 5 May 2021, world hand hygiene day, is "Seconds save lives - clean your hands". The WHO campaign calls to action key stakeholders: health care workers, IPC practitioners, patients and families, facility managers, policy-makers, vaccinators, and the general public who can play critical roles in achieving optimal hand hygiene at the point of care, helping to strengthen society involvement.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hand Hygiene , Infection Control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Health Personnel , Humans , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL